Look guys, I got my staff badge at school today. \o/ Now I don't look like an impostor sitting in the staffroom being all... young. And stuff. The lesson today went pretty well, though no-one did their homework. -_- I've assigned them something they have to read out loud in front of the class next week in revenge.

Oh hey, it's November now, I guess I should start revising for the JLPT in earnest. get out those past papers I bought and stuff. I also haven't gotten any confirmation from SOAS at all that they got my application for the test, I think I'll call them about it tomorrow. It's still a month until the actual test, but I did send the application ages ago.

At the moment, I am constructing my Christmas list. I really want one of these flannel shirts. ♥ I want to buy a least half of everything Uniqlo sell. UniqLo? UniQlo? UNIQLO?


In other news, I've been watching a cool documentary, called Race and Intelligence: Science's Last Taboo. Rageh Omaar, who is a journalist, I think? Goes around investigating the evidence behind the claim that intelligence is linked to race, going over the flaws in IQ tests, whether race is even a valid biological/genetic factor (not really, big surprise), and so on. The conclusion (SPOILERS! You should go watch it yourself unless you're not in the UK and Channel 4 won't let you) is something pretty cool that I'd never heard about before - since I know little about IQ tests - which is that the IQ test measures a certain kind of conceptual thinking that has been developing as we've adapted to modernity. Someone in the 1900s, for example, would score pretty badly by our current standards*. So, taking that into account, obviously the average score from sub-Saharan Africa would be lower than that from the USA or... I think North East Asia was the term they used.

It was a pretty excellent documentary, which thoroughly confirmed me in all my previous conclusions and offered me even more evidence to back them up with, allowing me to be continue being a smug git until the end of time. (It was quite balanced and objective in tone, though, while still acknowledging how personal and loaded the issue was, which I liked.)

* Also, it is massively biased towards the educated middle class. The one he took asked what an imaginary number was. How is that intelligence as opposed to knowledge?
[Dreamwidth mirror]